Edgar Noe Mendez v. Daniel Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDGAR NOE MENDEZ, Case No. CV 18-5443 JFW (PVC) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

WILLIAM SULLIVAN, Acting Warden, Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 23 In his objections, Petitioner asserts that he “know[s] [he] must get on his case” and begin the exhaustion process for which he was granted a stay on May 1, 2019. However, he states that he is unable to do so because he understands “very little English,” law library…