Aaron Raiser v. City of Murrieta
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 AARON RAISER, Case No. EDCV 19-183-DSF (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED
FINDINGS AND
CITY OF MURRIETA, ET AL., RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendant(s). 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; (2) Claims Two, Three, Five, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, and Twelve in the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend; (3) all other claims in the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with leave to amend; and (4) Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary…