Aaron Raiser v. City of Murrieta

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20205:19-cv-00183California1,555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 AARON RAISER, Case No. EDCV 19-183-DSF (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED

FINDINGS AND

CITY OF MURRIETA, ET AL., RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant(s). 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; (2) Claims Two, Three, Five, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, and Twelve in the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend; (3) all other claims in the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with leave to amend; and (4) Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.