Castel S.A. v. Christopher A. Wilson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 10 11 CASTEL S.A., a Luxembourg joint stock Case No.: 2:19-cv-09336-ODW-(MAAx) company (societe anonyme), 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS [46, 47, 48, 49]
15 CHRISTOPHER A. WILSON, an individual; PHAROS CAPITAL 16 PARTNERS II, LP, a Delaware limited 17 partnership; PHAROS CAPITAL PARTNERS II-A, LP, a Delaware limited 18 partnership; OLIVIA HO CHENG, an 19 individual; ARF PARTNERS, LLC, a 20 Massachusetts corporation; AURORA HEALTHCARE US CORP, a 21 Massachusetts corporation; STEVEN J. 22 JAMES, an individual. Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are four motions: 1. A Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 27 12(b)(6) filed by defendant Christopher Wilson (“Wilson”). (See Wilson Mot. to 28 Dismiss (“Wilson Mot.”), ECF No. 46.) 2. A Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), and 9(b) filed by 2 defendants Pharos …