Nazila Neman v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20202:19-cv-10104California4,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 NAZILA NEMAN, an individual; and Case No. 2:19-cv-10104-RGK (AFMx) BIJAN NEMAN, an individual; [State Court Case No. 19SMCV002881] Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED v. PROTECTIVE ORDER1

STATE FARM GENERAL

14 INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, 15 inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 22 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 23 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 24 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does 25 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that 26 the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 27 28 1This Stipulated Protective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.