Michael Rustom v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20202:20-cv-02517California969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-2517-MWF (SKx) Date: July 17, 2020 Title: Michael Rustom v. FCA US LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT [11]

Before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Rustom’s Motion to Remand (the “Motion”), filed on April 13, 2020. (Docket No. 12). On April 27, 2020, Defendants FCA US LLC (“FCA”) and San Fernando Motor Company DBA Rydell Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram (“Rydell”) filed a Notice of Non-Opposition. (Docket No. 12). The Motion was noticed to be heard on May 18, 2020. The Court read and considered the papers on the Motion and deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Rule 7-15. Vacating the hearing was further supported by the Continuity of Operations Plan arising from the COVID-19 emergency. The hearing was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.