Rosenthal and Rosenthal of California, Inc. v. Hilco Trading, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20202:19-cv-10315California4,540 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 11 ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL OF CASE NO. 2:19-cv-10315-SVW-MAA

CALIFORNIA, INC,

Hon. Stephen V. Wilson, Courtroom Plaintiff, 10A 14 v. STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER HILCO TRADING, LLC d/b/a HILCO GLOBAL and ERIC W. KAUP, an individual, 17 Defendants. 18

20 Plaintiff Rosenthal & Rosenthal of California, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Hilco Trading, LLC d/b/a Hilco Global and Eric W. Kaup (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff the “Parties”) hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.