D. R. v. City of Anaheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20208:20-cv-00659California2,234 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA D.R., by and through her guardian ad- Case No.: 8:20-cv-00659-DOC-JDE litem, Vanessa Gonzalez; and

CHRISTOPHER RAMIREZ,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL

Plaintiffs, INFORMATION v. CITY OF ANAHEIM; CITY OF [Note Change by the Court to ¶ 11] IRVINE; NICK BENNALLACK and 15 DOES 1-10, inclusive, 16 Defendants.

For good cause shown (see Dkt. 37), the Court finds and orders as follows. On or about July 13, 2020, the parties stipulated to a protective order regarding confidential information and seek to have a protective order entered by the Court based on that stipulation. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 1. Good Cause Statement: This action is likely to involve 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.