Brian Finander v. Riverside County California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20205:20-cv-00449California370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN FINANDER and No. CV 5:20-cv-00449-JVS (GJS)

MARLENE FINANDER,

12 Plaintiffs ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RIVERSIDE COUNTY [California], et al.,

Defendants.

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint [Dkt. 27] and all pleadings and documents filed and lodged in this action, including: the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint brought by Defendant County of Riverside [Dkt. 33, “County Motion”] and the related Opposition and Reply [Dkts. 46, 58]; the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint brought by Defendant Superior Court of California, County of Riverside [Dkt. 59, “Superior Court Motion”] and the related Opposition and Reply [Dkts. 65- 66]; the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 68, “Report”]; and Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.