Bianca E. Ochoa v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20202:20-cv-06466California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-6466 DMG (PVC) Date: July 24, 2020 Title B.E.O. v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED FOR AN

INADEQUATE SHOWING OF INDIGENCY (Dkt. No. 3) Plaintiff, through counsel, has filed a complaint seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for social security disability insurance benefits. (Dkt. No. 1). Concurrently with the complaint, Plaintiff filed a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (“IFP Application,” Dkt. No. 3). However, the IFP Application is incomplete. For example, Plaintiff indicates that she is employed but does not state her salary or wages per month. She also indicates that she receives food stamps, but does not state the amount. (Id. at 1). Furthermore, it is unclear how…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.