Dawn Marie Torres v. Andrew Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAWN T., Case No. 2:19-cv-08233-GJS Plaintiff v. MEMORANDUM OPINION

AND ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Dawn T. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11 and 12] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 18 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 19 (“Def. Br.”)]. The matter is now ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Court 25 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A. Berryhill. See…