Tina Marie Bradford v. Los Angeles County Office of Education

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20202:20-cv-03691California2,037 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JS-

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-3691 PSG (ASx) Date July 28, 2020 Title Tina Marie Bradford v. Los Angeles County Office of Education et al. Present: The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge Wendy Hernandez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s): Not Present Not Present Proceedings (In Chambers): The Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss and DENIES the motion to deem Plaintiff a vexatious litigant Before the Court is Defendants Los Angeles County Office of Education (“LACOE”), and York Risk Services Group, Inc.’s (“York”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motions to dismiss the complaint. See Dkts. # 13, 16. Also before the Court is Defendant LACOE’s motion to deem Plaintiff Tina Marie Bradford (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, a vexatious litigant. See Dkt. # 17 (“MVL”). Plaintiff has not opposed. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. Having considered the moving, opposing, and reply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.