James Shayler v. Vinood Patel

1 O 2 3

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 JAMES SHAYLER, Case No. 2:20-cv-00235-ODW (KSx) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v.

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

14 VINOOD PATEL; et al., DISMISS [33] Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION On January 8, 2020, Plaintiff James Shayler filed a complaint against 18 Defendants Vinood and Chaya Patel (collectively, the “Patels”) and Jose Uribe for 19 violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh 20 Act. Pending before the Court is Uribe’s motion to dismiss Shayler’s Complaint 21 (“Motion”). (Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 33.) For the reasons discussed 22 below, the Court GRANTS Uribe’s Motion.1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Shayler is a California resident who is allegedly disabled under the ADA. (First 25 Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 1, ECF No. 25.) He has had two knee replacement surgeries, 26 suffers from an acute pinched sciatic nerve and arthritis, has limited mobility in his

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed…