Danny Lee Freeman v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20202:19-cv-09099California7,920 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY LEE F., Case No. 2:19-cv-09099-KES

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v.

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

I.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In February 2016, Plaintiff Danny Lee F. (“Plaintiff”) applied for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits, alleging that he became disabled on March 13, 2015. Administrative Record (“AR”) 189, 193. On February 1, 2018, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted a hearing at which Plaintiff, who was represented by a non-attorney representative, testified along with a vocational expert (“VE”). AR 33-81.

1 His previous application for benefits was denied in October 2013. AR 83, 213. 28 On October 23, 2018, the ALJ issued an unfavorable decision. AR 12-32. The ALJ found that Plaintiff suffered from the severe medically determinable impairments (“MDIs”) of “lumbago [(i.e., lower back pain)]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.