Andre Mclish v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20202:19-cv-07237California3,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 12 ANDRE M., Case No. CV 19-07237-RAO 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Andre M.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. /// ///

Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW On February 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Title XVI application for SSI. (AR 172-77.) His application was denied initially on May 24, 2016 (AR 50-62), and upon reconsideration on July 27, 2016 (AR 63-74). Plaintiff filed a request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.