Leonardo Atienzo v. Andrew M. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEONARDO A., Case No. 2:19-cv-05395-MAA 12 Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
13 v. ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF
THE COMMISSIONER
14 ANDREW M. SAUL,2 Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 On June 20, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act. This matter is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Court affirms the final decision of the Commissioner.
Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 The Commissioner of Social Security is substituted as the Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). …