Steven Fishman v. William Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20202:19-cv-07202California1,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 STEVEN FISHMAN, ) Case No. 2:19-cv-7202-MWF-JC ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. ) CONCLUSIONS, AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED WILLIAM P. BARR, ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Attorney General, ) ) Respondent. ) ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the “Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus by a Person Detained in Federal Custody Pursuant to: 19 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and Report of Criminal Misconduct Pursuant to: 18 U.S.C. § 4” 20 (“Petition” or “Petition/Section 2255 Motion”), and all of the records herein, 21 including the April 30, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States 22 Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections to 23 the Report and Recommendation filed on May 15, 2020 (“Objections”). The Court 24 has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 25 Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.