Maria Eugenia Marmon v. William P. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20205:20-cv-00633California1,094 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Eugenia Marmon, CASE NUMBER 5:20-cv-00633-RGK-KES

PLAINTIFF(S)

v. P. Barr, et al., ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

DEFENDANT(S)

IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED.

Date United States Magistrate Judge

IS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED for the following reason(s): Inadequate showing of indigency District Court lacks jurisdiction [| Legally and/or factually patently frivolous |] Immunity as to Other:

Comments: Plaintiff failed to timely amend her IFP application; Plaintiff failed to allege facts showing standing. See attached.

August 3, 2020 /s/ Karen E. Scott Date United States Magistrate Judge IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby:

GRANTED

DENIED (see comments above). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: [_] Plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.