Diana Landaverde v. Movado Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20202:20-cv-06837California1,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-06837 PA (Ex) Date July 30, 2020 Title Diana Landaverde v. Movado Group, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE T. Jackson Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendants Movado Group, Inc., Movado Retail Group, Inc., and Steve Danielian (collectively “Defendants”). (Dkt. No.1 (“Removal”).) Defendants contend that this Court possesses diversity jurisdiction over the claims filed by plaintiff Diana Landaverde (‘Plaintiff’) based on the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress.” See, e.g., Kokkonen v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.