Mister Bailey v. Sammys Donuts and Ice Cream Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MISTER BAILEY, ) NO. CV 20-3055 FMO (AGRx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE SAMMY’S DONUTS AND ICE CREAM, ) INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) 16 17 Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 1, 2020 (Dkt. 1). By order dated July 21, 2020, plaintiff 18 was ordered to show cause, on or before July 28, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed 19 for plaintiff’s failure to serve defendant M.G.S. Investment, LLC (“MGS”) with the summons and 20 complaint. as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Dkt. 30, 21 Court’s Order of July 21, 2020). Plaintiff was admonished that “[f]ailure to file a timely response 22 to th[e] Order to Show Cause shall result in the action or the above defendant[s] being dismissed 23 for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court.” (Id.) (citing Fed. R. 24 Civ. P. 41(b)). As of the date of this Order,…