Lance Williams v. S. Sabo

Bad Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20202:20-cv-01373-PA-KKCalifornia6,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No. CV 20-1373-PA (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

S. SABO, ET AL., LEAVE TO AMEND

Defendant(s).

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) setting forth seven claims against thirty-three defendants. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the FAC with leave to amend. II. BACKGROUND On February 3, 2020, Plaintiff, an inmate at California Men’s Colony – East (“CMC”), constructively filed1 a Complaint against defendants John/Jane Does 1-10, 27 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a S. Sabo, E. De La Garza, J. Gastelo, and “Jane Doe – CMC intake nurse on 9-11-19”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.