Luis Garcia v. R.J. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20202:19-cv-09382California1,026 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS GARCIA, Case No. CV 19-9382 JLS (PVC) Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

R. JOHNSON, Warden, et al., STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondents. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 22 In his Objections, Petitioner argues at length about the purported merits of his due process claim. (Obj. at 4-7). However, the Petition is denied because it fails to state a cognizable habeas claim. Petitioner further asserts that if his claim is not cognizable in habeas, the Court should construe it as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.