Protective Insurance Company v. Iriana Insurance Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20202:20-cv-07216California578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. LA CV20-07216 JAK (Ex) Date August 19, 2020

Title Protective Insurance Company et al. v. Iriana Insurance Services, Inc, et al.

Present: The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cheryl Wynn Not Reported

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

On August 11, 2020, Protective Insurance Company and Express Messenger Systems, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), which are separate parties, brought this action seeking reimbursement for amounts paid to resolve a prior action. The complaint (“Complaint” (Dkt. 1)), which asserts seven causes of action under California law, alleges that there is diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Diversity jurisdiction requires that “the citizenship of each plaintiff is different from that of each defendant.” Hunter v. Philip Morris USA, 582 F.3d 1039, 1043 (9th Cir. 2009). It also requires that the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.