Kym Brooks v. T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20205:20-cv-01654California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-01654 PA (SHKx) Date August 19, 2020 Title Kym Brooks v. T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE T. Jackson Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS

Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendants T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC and Pamela McKnight (“Defendants”). Defendants assert this Court has jurisdiction over the action brought against it by plaintiff Kym Brooks (“Plaintiff”) based on the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See, e.g., Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). A suit filed in state court may be removed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.