Darryl A. Jackson v. Von Blackensee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL A. JACKSON, Case No. CV 20-4161 PA (SP) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

VON BLANCKENSEE, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner and respondents have objected. The Court accepts in part and denies in part the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in Bolden v. Ponce, 20 CV 03870 JFW MAA, 20 WL 2097751, at *1-2 (C.D. Cal. May 1, 2020) (“living conditions” claim should have been brought as a civil rights complaint rather than in a habeas petition) Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6) is granted to the extent it seeks dismissal…