Armenta

Dennis Petillo, Jr. v. Armenta

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20202:20-cv-07082California1,100 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:20-cv-07082-JFW-MAA Date: August 20, 2020 Title: Dennis Petillo, Jr. v. Armenta, et al.

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

James Muñoz N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order re: Filing of Petition

On August 3, 2020, the Court received and filed Petitioner Dennis Petillo, Jr.’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Petition,” ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleges two grounds for relief: (1) a claim that Respondent violated the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, as well as various statutes and regulations, when Petitioner purportedly was denied medical treatment for chest pain and difficulty breathing; and (2) a claim that Respondent violated the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, as well as various statutes and by allegedly making…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.