1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

11 JONATHAN MORRIS, No. CV 20-01174-MWF-RAO 12 Plaintiff, 13 PROTECTIVE ORDER PERTAINING TO v. SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION 14 (SSI)

CHAD WOLF, ACTING

15 SECRETARY, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

16 SECURITY, Honorable Rozella A. Oliver

17 Defendant. United States Magistrate Judge

18

19

20 It is hereby ordered that the following Protective Order be entered in accordance 21 with Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and shall hereafter govern the 22 use, handling, and disposition of information, testimony or documents obtained during 23 discovery in the above captioned matter (“the Litigation”), which constitutes Sensitive 24 Security Information (“SSI”) as defined by 49 C.F.R. Part 1520. 25 1. SSI is a specific category of information that requires protection against 26 unauthorized disclosure pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 114(r) and 49 C.F.R. Part 1520. 27 Unauthorized disclosure of SSI may be detrimental to the security of transportation, may 1 constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or may reveal a trade secret or 2 privileged or confidential commercial or financial information. Unauthorized disclosure 3 may also result in a civil enforcement penalty or other enforcement action by the 4 Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) against the party making the 5 unauthorized disclosure. 49 C.F.R. § 1520.17. 6 2. Access to SSI is limited to “covered persons” with a “need to know” as set 7 forth in 49 C.F.R. § 1520.7 and § 1520.11. Because the parties, their attorneys, the Court 8 and its employees may be “covered persons” with a “need to know” some or all of the 9 SSI relevant to this case, this order permits the sharing through discovery in this civil 10 action of relevant information and materials that are marked as SSI or may contain SSI, 11 provided that Plaintiff has access to such information during his employment with TSA. 12 The right of access to discovery materials marked as SSI or containing SSI shall be 13 limited to the Court and its employees, Plaintiff, and counsel for the parties, paralegal, 14 secretarial and clerical personnel in their employ. Court reporters retained by the parties 15 for purposes of recording depositions and those who have signed a TSA-approved Non- 16 Disclosure Agreement may also have access to SSI. 17 3. Discovery Material encompassed in this Protective Order includes, without 18 limitation, deposition testimony, deposition exhibits, interrogatory responses, 19 admissions, affidavits, declarations, documents produced pursuant to compulsory 20 process or voluntarily in lieu of process, and any other documents or information 21 produced or given to one party by another party or by a third party in connection with 22 discovery in this matter. Information taken from Discovery Material that reveals its 23 substance shall also be considered Discovery Material. 24 4. “Covered persons” have an express duty to protect against the unauthorized 25 disclosure of SSI. 49 C.F.R. § 1520.9. SSI must be safeguarded in such a way that it is 26 not physically or visually accessible to persons who do not have a “need to know,” as 27 defined in 49 C.F.R. § 1520.11. When unattended, SSI must be secured in a locked 1 5. Documents that contain SSI may not be further disseminated to persons 2 without a “need to know” except with written permission from TSA. SSI must not be 3 disclosed by either party to any person or entity other than those enumerated in 4 paragraph 2. 5 6. All documents subject to this Protective Order shall be marked as follows: 6 “Confidential: Subject to SSI Protective Order in Jonathan Morris v. Chad Wolf, CV 20- 7 01174-MWF-RAO.” Documents containing SSI that inadvertently have not been 8 marked as SSI still must be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure. 9 7. Documents that are marked SSI or, though not marked, contain SSI, shall be 10 treated as confidential and shall not be published or made available to the general public 11 in any form (whether in paper or electronic form), but instead shall be filed under seal. 12 Material filed under seal will be available only to the persons enumerated in paragraph 2. 13 8. Deposition testimony that may contain SSI should be so designated by 14 verbal notice or written notice within 10 days of receipt of the transcript. However, 15 testimony containing SSI that is not designated, through mistake, nonetheless must be 16 safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure. 17 9. All hearings, or portions thereof, in which SSI may be disclosed, always 18 shall be closed to the public. If there is a possibility that SSI may be disclosed at trial, the 19 courtroom shall be closed to the public. 20 10. Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel may use SSI disclosed to them in this 21 Litigation only for the purposes of the Litigation. SSI may not be further disseminated, 22 including to a jury, except with written permission from TSA. 23 12. All documents subject to this Protective Order in the possession of Plaintiff 24 or Plaintiff’s counsel shall be returned to TSA within 60 days of termination of this 25 litigation, including any appellate proceedings, or shall be certified in writing to TSA to 26 have been destroyed by Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s counsel in accordance with TSA’s 27 requirements for the destruction of documents containing SSI. 1 || subject to this Order to any Judge, Magistrate, or employee of the Court for purposes of 2 || this action. 3 14. This Protective Order is without prejudice to the rights of any party to make 4 || any objection to discovery or use of SSI, or documents that may contain SSI, permitted 5 || by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or any statute, regulation, or other authority. 6 7 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 8 Good cause exists for the entry of this protective order, see Rivera v. NIBCO, Inc., 9 | 364 F.3d 1057, 1063 (9th Cir. 2004), because the disclosure of the SSI in question by 10 || definition would be “detrimental to the security of transportation,” 49 C.F.R. 11 | § 1520.5(a)(3), and therefore cause substantial harm to public safety. If unauthorized 12 || individuals were able to discover information about how TSA conducts its screening 13 || operations, they might be able to evade TSA’s security operations and engage in acts of 14 | terrorism. Therefore, this protective order is necessary to allow the parties to exchange 15 || relevant documents and information in accordance with federal law and national security 16 || without the undue burden and expense of additional protective measures. 17 18 19 Dated this 24th day of August, 2020. 20 . 21 Rapetis, Qa,

23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28