C.J.
C.J. v. Bellflower Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION & BACKROUND
The Court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78: Local Rule 7-15. This is the second request for attorneys’ fees in this dispute. See ECF No. 23. For purposes of this “fees on fees” order, the Court provides an abbreviated history of the case: a more detailed history can be found in this Court’s July 10, 2020 order. See id. This case arises from a dispute concerning a school district’s obligation to provide a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to one of its students pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (“IDEA”). Plaintiffs are C.J. and her 11-year-old son, N.J. NJ. is a child with disabilities entitled to receive special education and related services sufficient to provide him with a FAPE, as set forth
CV-549 (01/18) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL ‘O’
Case No. 2:19-CV-8752-CAS (MRWx) Date August 21, 2020 Title C.J. v. BELLFLOWER UNIFIED SCHOOL…