Matthew Pristave v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20202:20-cv-04892California1,989 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On April 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court asserting claims for violations of the Song-Beverly Warranty Act, or California’s “lemon law,” in connection with his 2013 Ford C-Max (“Vehicle”). (Complaint (“Compl.”’), Dkt. No. 3 at Ex. B, at 17 of 87). On June 2, 2020, Defendant removed the case to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441, and 1446. (Defendant’s Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Dkt No. 1).

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk CB

II. LEGAL STANDARD

A defendant may remove a civil action filed in state court to federal district court when the federal court has original jurisdiction over the action. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). “The burden of establishing jurisdiction falls on the party invoking the removal statute, which is strictly construed against removal.” Sullivan v. First Affiliated Sec., Inc., 813 F.2d 1368, 1371 (9th Cir. 1987) (internal citations omitted); see also Duncan v. Stuetzle, 76 F.3d 1480, 1485 (9th Cir. 1996). “The ‘strong presumption’ against removal jurisdiction means that the defendant always has the burden of establishing that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.