Fernando Delgado v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20202:18-cv-02699California902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO DELGADO, Case No. 2:18-cv-02699-FMO-MAA 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on June 18, 2020 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 22.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. I. Ground One As to Ground One of the First Amended Petition, Petitioner argues in his Objections that the Magistrate Judge erred in concluding that the state court’s 28 harmless error analysis was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.