Deshon Aaron Atkins v. W. L. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20202:18-cv-06877California691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESHON AARON ATKINS, Case No. 2:18-cv-06877-DOC-MAA 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

W.L. MONTGOMERY, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on June 29, 2020 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 26.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. First, Petitioner argues that the Magistrate Judge overlooked his challenge to the state court’s factual summary of the conviction. (Objs., at 2.) The Court of Appeal’s factual summary, which was adopted by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.