Julie Pascale v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20202:19-cv-08308California3,203 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIE P., Case No. 2:19-cv-08308-GJS

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security 15 Administration, Defendant. I. PROCEDUR AL HISTORY Julie P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security terminating her previously granted Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. [Dkt. 1.] The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 9 and 10] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 14 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 15 (“Def. Br.”), and Dkt. 16 (“Rep.”)]. The Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For the reasons discussed

In the interest of protecting Plaintiff’s privacy, this Memorandum Opinion and Order uses Plaintiff’s first name last initial. 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.