Robert James Ossawa Wood v. Neil McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20202:19-cv-10102California402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ) ROBERT JAMES OSSAWA WOOD, ) Case No. CV 19-10102-RSWL (JEM) ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NEIL MCDOWELL, ) ) Respondent. ) ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the 18 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 19 Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time 20 allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the 21 Magistrate Judge. 22 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 23 (1) Respondent’s Motion to Vacate is GRANTED. 24 (2) Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(a), the Court hereby REFERS the Petition 25 to the Ninth Circuit for consideration as an application for leave to file a second or 26 successive habeas corpus petition. 27 28 “Petitioner is advised that this referral alone does not constitute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.