Sierra Brown v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20202:20-cv-00598California893 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 10 11 SIERRA BROWN, Case № 2:20-cv-0598-ODW (SKx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. DISMISS [42]

15 UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Defendants UMG Recordings, Inc., Interscope Geffen 19 A&M Records, Inc., and Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp.’s (“Defendants”) 20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Sierra Brown’s Complaint (“Motion”). (See Mot.) After 21 carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court 22 deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument on August 4, 2020. 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. On January 21, 2020, Brown initiated this action for copyright infringement 25 against numerous defendants. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Despite the Court granting 26 Brown several extensions of time to serve, all but the moving Defendants have been 27 1 Defendants note that Interscope Geffen A&M Records is an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.