Kamorrie Randle v. R. Grounds

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20202:14-cv-02611California1,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ? CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAMORRIE RANDLE, Case No. 2:14-cv-02611-DSF-JC Peutioner, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND V. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

R. GROUNDS,

15 Respondent. 171. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY In an order dated November 15, 2018 (“November Order’), this Court 19 || granted petitioner’s motion to stay this action for petitioner to exhaust Grounds 20 || Three through Five in the pending Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) 21 |! and directed him, beginning thirty (30) days from the date of the November Order 22 |! and every sixty days thereafter, to file a status report detailing the status of the state 23 court proceedings to exhaust his unexhausted claims. (Docket No. 36). The November Order further expressly cautioned petitioner that the failure to meet any 25 |! of the time requirements contained in the November Order would result in an order 26 |! vacating the stay, nunc pro tunc, might preclude consideration of the unexhausted 27 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.