Sandoval

Andrew Edmund Armbrister v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20205:20-cv-00034California608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case 5:20-cv-0034-JLS (GJS) Date August 31, 2020 No. Title Andrew Edmund Armbrister v. C/O Sandoval

Present: Hon. Gail J. Standish, United States Magistrate Judge E. Carson N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Possible Dismissal Under Rule 4(m) and Rule 41(b)

On January 7, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging an Eighth Amendment Failure to Protect claim against Defendant Sandoval, a Correctional Officer at the California Rehabilitation Center (“CRC”) in Norco, California.

On January 14, 2020, this Court issued an order directing service of process on defendant by the United States Marshal. [Dkt. 9.] The Court cautioned Plaintiff that he must provide sufficient information to allow the United States Marshal to identify and serve Defendant. The Order also informed Plaintiff that service had to be completed within 90 days pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.