Neurobrands, LLC v. Neurogum, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:20-cv-03612California4,997 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
NEUROBRANDS, LLC
Case No. 2:20-cv-03612-FMO-KS Plaintiff, v. PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
NEUROGUM, INC. Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based on the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulation”) filed on August 28, 2020, the terms of the protective order to which the parties have agreed are adopted as a protective order of this Court (which generally shall govern the pretrial phase of this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, that those terms have been modified by the Court’s amendment of paragraph 11 of the Stipulation. 8 AGREED TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AS ADOPTED AND MODIFIED BY THE COURT1 11 1. A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 14 …