Neurobrands, LLC v. Neurogum, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:20-cv-03612California4,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

NEUROBRANDS, LLC

Case No. 2:20-cv-03612-FMO-KS Plaintiff, v. PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

NEUROGUM, INC. Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based on the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulation”) filed on August 28, 2020, the terms of the protective order to which the parties have agreed are adopted as a protective order of this Court (which generally shall govern the pretrial phase of this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, that those terms have been modified by the Court’s amendment of paragraph 11 of the Stipulation. 8 AGREED TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AS ADOPTED AND MODIFIED BY THE COURT1 11 1. A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 14 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.