Andre Marvin Jennings v. People of the State of Riverside CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20205:20-cv-00971California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 20-0971-ODW (KS) Date: August 31, 2020 Title Andre Marvin Jennings v. People of the State of Riverside CA

Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge

Gay Roberson Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioners: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

On May 5, 2020, Petitioner, a California state resident proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (the “Petition”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On July 10, 2020, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) on the grounds that the Petition is wholly unexhausted. (Dkt. No. 19.) Pursuant to the Court’s May 29, 2020 Order, Petitioner’s Opposition to that Motion was due within 30 days of the service of the Motion—that is, no later than August 9, 2020. (See Dkt. No. 12 at 3.) More than three weeks have now passed since the date on which Petitioner’s opposition was due, and Petitioner has not filed a response to the Motion to Dismiss. Local Rule 7-12 states that a party’s failure to file a required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.