Richard Covarrubias v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:19-cv-08555California7,675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

19 Plaintiff Richard C. (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of his 20 application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). For the reasons stated below, 21 the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED.

II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW

23 On December 11, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Title XVI application for SSI. 24 (Administrative Record (“AR”) 178-80.) His application was initially denied on 25 April 25, 2016 (AR 100-04), and upon reconsideration on August 2, 2016 (AR 110- 26 27 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 14). Plaintiff filed a written request for a hearing (AR 116-17), and a hearing was held on June 1, 2018 (AR 32.). Represented by counsel, Plaintiff appeared and testified, along with an impartial vocational expert. (AR 32-68.) On September 4, 2018, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff had not been under a disability, pursuant to the Social Security Act, since December 11,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.