Thomas K. Mills v. S. Marsh
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, Case No. 2:19-cv-05237-DDP-MAA 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
S. MARSH, Associate Warden, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“R&R”). (R&R, ECF No. 51). The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on January 21, 2020 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 53.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the R&R to which Petitioner specifically has objected. Petitioner contends that this federal court “can recommend [him] for resentening [sic]” by completing a form addressed to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). …