Cari R. Andrews v. Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20202:20-cv-06332California1,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc., Casey Stewart, and Brittany Deatrich (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging the following claims for relief: (1) wrongful termination in violation of public policy; (2) discrimination based on medical condition and disability in violation of California Government Code § 12940; (3) retaliation in violation of California Government Code § 12940; (4) failure to accommodate in violation of California Government Code § 12940(m); (5) failure to engage in interactive process in violation of California Government Code § 12940(n); (6) failure to prevent discrimination in violation of California Government Code § 12940; and (7) harassment based on medical condition in violation of California Government Code § 12940. The seventh claim for relief for harassment based on medical condition in violation of California Government Code § 12940 is the only claim alleged against the individual defendants, Casey Stewart and Brittany Deatrich. On July 15, 2020, Defendant Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc. filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.