Michael Lawrence Lhevan v. Scott Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20208:16-cv-01241California802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

MICHAEL L. LHEVAN, ) NO. SACV 16-01240-GW (AGR)

) NO. SACV 16-01241-GW (AGR) 12 Petitioner, ) ) 13 v. ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS 14 SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, ) AND RECOMMENDATION OF ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Respondent. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petitions for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.1 Petitioner’s objections are largely unintelligible. It is unclear whether Petitioner’s objections assert new grounds for relief. To the extent that Petitioner 26 1 The magistrate judge issued a consolidated Report for both cases. Because the objections in each…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.