Chrispin Garcia v. People of The State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20202:20-cv-07849California2,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-07849 FMO (PVC) Date: September 3, 2020 Title Chrispin Garcia v. W.L. Montgomery, Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Respondents: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY

On August 23, 2020,1 Chrispin Garcia (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the “Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner asserts a single claim: that his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when the Alhambra court imposed an unauthorized term of five years for enhancements pursuant to California Penal Code § 667(a)(1) and § 667.5(b). (Petition at 5). For the reasons set forth below, the Petition appears to be untimely.

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”) applies to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.