Tyshaun Andrew Jackson v. Warren L. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20202:20-cv-04461California822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case 2:20-cv-04461-DOC-GJS Date September 4, No. 2020 Title Tyshaun Andrew Jackson v. Warren L. Montgomery

Present: Hon. Gail J. Standish, United States Magistrate Judge E. Carson N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Vacating Rhines Stay Nunc Pro Tunc; and Order to Show Cause

Petitioner is represented by counsel in this case and filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition in this action on May 18, 2020, raising seven grounds. Contrary to the requirements of the CV-69 form petition used in this District, Petitioner did not identify his claims in the Petition itself and, critically, did not identify whether his claims are exhausted. Rather, he directed the Court to review a separately filed memorandum of points and authorities and stated that “some” of his claims were raised on direct appeal in the California Court of Appeal1 and “some are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.