Luanne Danielle Dunning v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20202:19-cv-08662California7,338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUANNE D. D., Case No. CV 19-08662 PVC

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND v. ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Luanne D. D. (“Plaintiff”) appeals from the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Agency”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 11–13). For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this decision. 24 25 26 The Court partially redacts Plaintiff’s name in compliance with Federal Rule of 27 Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. I.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.