Elbert Lee Haskins III v. S. Montes

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20202:20-cv-07957California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:20-07957 DSF (ADS) Date: September 3, 2020 Title: Elbert Lee Haskins III v. S Montes, et al.

Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge

Kristee Hopkins None Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

On August 23, 2020, Plaintiff Elbert Lee Haskins, an inmate at Kern Valley State Prison, filed a Civil Rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [Dkt. No. 1]. In response to the question, “[i]s the grievance procedure completed?” Plaintiff checked “yes” but then states, “recent to 3rd level waiting response.” [Id. at p. 2]. Based on Plaintiff’s statement, it appears the grievance procedure has not been completed.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires that “no action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions [under Section 1983], or any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.