Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 MICHAEL TERPIN, Case No. 2:18-cv-06975-ODW (KSx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v.
DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL
14 AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS [43]
15 Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”) moves to dismiss certain of 19 Plaintiff Michael Terpin’s (“Mr. Terpin”) claims in his Second Amended Complaint 20 (“SAC”), including deceit by concealment, misrepresentation, requests for punitive 21 damages, and all claims against Doe defendants (the “Motion”). (Mot., ECF No. 43.) 22 For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS AT&T’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND As previously set forth in the Court’s February 24, 2020 Order (“Feb. Order”), 25 (ECF No. 37), granting in part and denying in part AT&T’s motion to dismiss the 26 First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Mr. Terpin is a prominent and well-known
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court…