Natosha Sanders v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20202:19-cv-05134California3,411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATOSHA S., ) Case No. CV 19-5134-JPR 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. ) AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER 13 )

ANDREW M. SAUL, )

14 Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) 15 ) Defendant. ) 16 I. PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her applications for Social Security disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income benefits (“SSI”). The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation, filed July 30, 2020, which the Court has taken under submission without oral argument. 25 26 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in line with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.