Rose Munoz v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 ROSE M.1, Case No. CV 19-7681-AS
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM OPINION
v.
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.
For the reasons discussed below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner’s 20 decision is affirmed.
Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 28 Proceedings 2 On September 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking 3 review of the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiff’s application for 4 a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) 5 under Title II of the Social Security Act. (Dkt. No. 1). On 6 February 25, 2020, Defendant filed an Answer and the Administrative Record (“AR”). (Dkt. Nos. 15-16). …