Brian Goldberg v. Nayal Yashar

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20202:17-cv-09226California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2

4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

10 BRIAN GOLDBERG, ) CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09226-AB- ) GJS 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING EX ) vs. ) PARTE APPLICATION TO ) REMAND THE MATTER TO NAYAL YASHAR, ET AL., ) STATE COURT DUE TO ) LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER Defendants. ) JURISDICTION )

) )

_____________________________________

21 The Court has reviewed Defendants’ Ex Parte Application to Remand the 22 Matter to State Court Due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Application,” 23 Dkt. No. 122), and Plaintiff’s Opposition (Dkt. No. 124) and the City’s Response 24 (Dkt. No. 126) thereto. The Application is GRANTED. 25 Plaintiff originally filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court. It 26 was removed to this Court based on federal question jurisdiction deriving from 27 Plaintiff’s claim against the City of Beverly Hills under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.