Kristen N. Cooley v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20208:20-cv-00876California4,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 8:20-CV-00876-DOC-JDE KRISTEN N. COOLEY, guardian of the 12 estate of N.O.C, a minor,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

Plaintiff, ORDER

14 v. [Note Changes by the Court] 15 TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET ENTERPRISE, INC., and JOHN DOES 16 1-10, Defendants. 18 19 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules 20 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, and the 21 authorities cited herein, as well as the Stipulation (Dkt. 77) by and between Plaintiff 22 Kristen N. Cooley, guardian of the estate of N.O.C., a minor, and Defendants Target 23 Corporation and Target Enterprise, Inc., for good cause shown, the Court finds and 24 orders as follows. 25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 26 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve 27 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 28 1 protection from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.